This is something military games have been telling us for many years. I don't think this was about introducing more reality to games, that was just the most convincing excuse they could conjure up. What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. Just by the name alone people said it was a bully simulator. 840 21. Boy they would hate what I did with my evil characters in skyrim and fallout 4. Nothing happened in 20w09a but they deserved it. What do you call a character that runs? 17 Sep 2022 19:30:26 . We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. Sun Tzu would probably laugh at all of it. Yes gamers should be held responsible. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The world must hold Vladimir Putin and his inner circle accountable for international crimes war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression . Warrior Nation: Anti-establishment ethos: critiquing the military and foreign policy, Warrior Nation: Very murky: the arms trade and Parliament, Warrior Nation podcast Gentleman Bureaucrat Masculinity: liberal militarism and the civil service, Warrior Nation podcast Lifting the Rock: the military and justice, Warrior Nation podcast Dirty Secrets: the press and the military, Warrior Nation podcast: Unpacking Armed Forces Day. What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. I also think more realism is always good in games. sheesh. 311 6. . "We're not trying to make games boring or preachy, but were hoping that the ones that offer a realistic portrayal of a modern battlefield can incorporate some sort of reward or penalties depending on whether they follow the basic rules of armed conflict. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. ODogX 6 may 2020 692 27 *remembers what happened in Dubai* BUKLAU_CHANG 6 may 2020 618 46 Should politicians be held accountable for the wars they start? We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. People need thicker skin not just tissue paper for protection . Though I actually play pretty nice. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." 431 39. After reading what counts as one online, and not counting repeat offences, becase for most it is more than once, and in many cases more than I would be able remember, here is a list of ingame warcrimes I have commited because I am bored; Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention: Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health; Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. Saryn standing trial for his war crimes as the corpses sue him for damages. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) Doesn't seem like an outrageous demand to me. ShOuLD GAmers bE aCcOunTaBle foR iN gAmE wAr cRiMeS | Let's Talk War Loch 393 subscribers Subscribe 194 Share 4.9K views 2 years ago Sorry about the gusts of breath, As most of you probs. Really!? Privacy Policy. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Post your templates or request one instead! Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. It's not interested in excising the offending scenarios from games entirely, arguing that "sanitizing videogames of such acts is not realistic" given such atrocities do occur in real conflict. Rich_Boy_420 30 apr 2020. "Putin's shelling of Europe's largest nuclear plant takes his reign of . Great list, but it sounds like you need to play Plague Inc. Plague.Inc and People Playground players: My testificate genocide of 2018 is about to unleashed upon the brains of the public. I thought that was the whole reasoning behind online gaming tears are just so sweet . 1.8K 106. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Our intention is not to spoil players enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. Just that their warcrimes have consequences. TheCommittee has released a statement in which it outlines its desire to collaborate with video game developers to show the consequences of a player's actions if they engage in virtual torture, the harming of civilians, attacks on medical personnel, or anything else covered by theGeneva Convention. Lol. Its just making it more realistic, the same way the military has rules on the battlefield, then gamers have the same rules., While concern over the influence of violence in video games is shared by many, researchers have not established a definitive link. Re-start mission?". Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Pages: 1 [2] Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? It is also only suggesting this for games that represent realistic military situations. By . Article (with reader comments) from The Guardian. RPC Shutdown Notice - Live until September 2022. We battle and slug it out and despite losing . If you kill an enemy combatant in real life, then t-bag the shit outta his/her face, is that a crime? 3 comment. - Mongoose - 10-06-2013 Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) Should Gamers be penalised for carrying out unlawful acts in a Video Game? You want grief? I mean why put your self out online if you have such a weak self image if what someone you may never meet or know could influence your feelings or make you day or even a minute of your day bad , why ? It sounds to me more like some guy's personal vendetta against gamers. The Arma series currently on its third iteration is detailed enough to be used for training purposes by many of the world's standing armies. If nothing else, adding behind-the-scenes political proceedings would increase the realism and imersiveness of war games, making them more fun (to me, anyway). Advertisement. Plenty of warfare though. . If I think too hard on how this level of insanity and/or sheer stupidity came about I'm going to bust my brain. The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. (Read 1746 times) If courts were to punish you for virtual crimes, it should be their responsibility to say what you can and what you can't do in the game yet people are charged for crimes in the . Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. Ukraine has also accused Russia of genocide, listed. Dont shoot the civilians. But what it wouldnt let you do was kill passing civilians: collateral damage of this sort took a big chunk off your health bar. So I take out a Tristan vs his Thorax and we begin. Hybbridd 3 feb 2022. But it could realistically be put in actual military simulators, such as ARMA for example. A Q&A document posted on the organization's website. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the. Is this feasible? There should be no responsibility or games would get boring, we play them to escape responsibility. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? Buddy, that's amature stuff compared to r/RimWorld. 12/2019 - 11/20212 roky. All Rights Reserved, By submitting your email, you agree to our. The ICRC is concerned that certain game scenarios could lead to a trivialization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, they added. 618 5. We are not talking about censorship or banning anything, he added. The people in the world who are committing the majority of the war crimes, have also never even seen a gaming unit, and a Red Cross is nothing more than an aiming reference and resupply point. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. The latter is too intricately tied in with atavistic gameplay systems for us to extrapolate anything deeper than game over. Please check out our wiki page, where we post template albums of popular media! These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, you'll probably get a 'mission failed' message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. Persona Sie. Quote: The Red Cross wants to have a greater influence in the virtual world of battlefields. Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? A place to post memes about Minecraft! 2. How do you move beyond the simple message, "Mission failed, you have broken international law and will spend the next ten years in prison. Though this kind of makes me think of a bunch of 10-year-olds running around in the deserts of the Middle East, screaming long lines of cuss words at each other while shooting anything that moves. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. For the purpose of this Statute, crime against humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: Deportation or forcible transfer of population. Killing civilians gets points deducted or what-have-you, while shooting the baddies progresses the game or gets you points. His claim may be valid: in 2011, British broadcaster ITVused footage from video gameArma II to illustrate purported paramilitary action. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Why though? The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. Furthermore, the ICRC statement makes clear that it is not interested in other genres it is concentrating on combat games that depict and concentrate on contemporary battlefields. In a scene reminiscent of the Black Hawk Down incident, they must decide whether to shoot their way out or face death. 99% of the possible targets on the field were in fact baddies and had the free to kill on them. What would be the fun if this was ethical? Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: shootouts often occur in areas where civilians are in the line of fire. How dare any news organisation report something that people don't want to hear. It's not actually advocating that gamers themselves suffer some kind of actual punishment for committing in-game warcrimes. Video games that represent contemporary battlefields are very close to reality, he said. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. Hello! and our Home article Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? PhantOS. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It is these sorts of split-second decisions that really suggest something about the complexities of combat. It wants developers to say, in this mission you must fly an armed drone over a school where terrorists are known to be hiding, and you must decide whether to open fire. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. He added that they were not concerned with fantasy games, but those that mimic situations that might be seen in current armed conflicts, known as first person shooters although he declined to name specific titles. 2022 Monday Good Morning Good Night. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. That's how I read it, and honestly? This topic makes me laugh. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. Remember, no Russian. Yes that will make games soooo much more enjoyable by inserting nagging fucking lawyers. [History] Keith Stuart / The Guardian - "Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?" (2013) KotakuInAction Original. "It's difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.". This'. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments' reflection on innocent victims. Quit trying to run with 'video games teach kids violence', and blame bad parenting and lack of accountability in this day and age. shoot civilian, fail mission the player will usually read these instances in ludic terms. But then, of course, these examples offer more than a mere punishment mechanic which is what the ICRC seems to be asking for. It's not worth the expense. Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need. Same. April 22, 2020, 10:47:38 PM . You will not believe how many times I tell to random dudes. The amount of people I've killed in horrible, horrible ways in the Prototype series alone will have me locked away for a very long time. The Open Society Foundations support international and Ukrainian organizations working to gather evidence of war crimes, aggression, and crimes against humanity committed during Russia's war against Ukraine and advocate for accountability, including: The 5 AM Coalition, a partnership uniting dozens of Ukrainian human rights organizations to . This is something military games have been telling us for many years. *snort* I would love to see them try to arrest and charge that many people smfh, its a fake world, full of fake people, me and the boys on our way to the execution chamber. Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through. The ICRC says sanitizing video games is not realistic. I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. Besides, 'realism' in cases such as this would likely amount to pushing particularly political agendas. We do often see the consequences of player actions being threaded into gameplay, but this tends to be in the adventure genre. I don't think anything like this would ever go in, but I'd still be intrigued by a game that did have more than just "go pew pew pew everything" as part of the gameplay. Mongoose, Brno, South Moravia, Czechia. If governments aren't being held accountable for war crimes anymore, why should people playing video games? The International Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that it won't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. Remember, no russian. It may not display this or other websites correctly. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause: Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which are generally recognized as indispensable. It involves using at least one more brain cell, and that's always a good thing. Every time someone blows up my car in GTA, I want the recovery cost irl. And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. Founded by Frank Galli in 2000, Snipers Hide has been offering informational videos, podcasts, and other support to its users in one location. 1. Hangar 13. (Read 1802 times) Epicduke. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes Meanwhile everyone whose played Modern Warfare 2 meme from Gamer Memes Download - MemeZila.com. Should Gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Both Conservatives and Liberals act like such fucking cunts when it comes to violent video games. Video games, while violent and often depicting death, do not result in the real world equivalent of dead people. Dont kill last guy take him to me. Tsk, tsk. No Votes: 18 94.7% Other Votes: . People playground players. A Q&A document posted on the organisation's website explains: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. They would absolutely lose it since everything goes! With this thinking Ill get a call from my insurance company when I crash a G6 in Grand theft auto. Many of. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Should non-gamers be accountable for real-world war crimes? Though now that i stop to think about it, is modern war anything other than it twitched shoot it? The, Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. nup thats the check if they are really dead test, ^^^^ no, but getting left with blue balls after a pillow fight with one of the girls. Barrett explained that the ICRC were already working with production companies to incorporate these rules into games and others who they had not contacted, had also incorporated some of them into their products. It's also pretty terrifying that there's people out there seriously considering proposing something like this, though little surprises me when many of those in positions of influence and power turn out to be out of touch with reality and/or corrupt. The idea of an action adventure that put the player into a series of defining humanitarian situations allowing the story to spin-off in the player's moral direction is interesting but it's hugely unlikely in the action cinema world of the modern shooter. Hahaha 'no russian' would have half the men ages like 18-30 locked up and on death row right now. These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. Me who plays all the people chemical warfare. Odd as it sounds, but I'd actually enjoy seeing this sort of thing in those military simulators. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising.
How Old Is J Anthony Brown Age, Monstera Fuzzy Roots, Perfume Similar To Gilly Hicks La Perouse, Southern Living Whipping Cream Cake, Articles S